Check the acquisition promise
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Santiago Romani Castroman · iOS
Explore the ad evidence, study the storefront, and build your next acquisition hypothesis.
01 / Creative research
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Explore apps with direct store-link matches. Compare their hooks and formats without assuming the same approach works here.
Browse observed advertisers ↗Store rankings and revenue estimates describe market context. They do not establish ad spend, conversions or ROAS.
Review the market context ↗02 / Storefront & product
Study the product story and store experience behind the acquisition funnel.
03 / Market context
Keep revenue, downloads and store rankings separate from advertising performance.
Did Mensa, got 142. Where are the solutions? Also, being color blind hurts you especially in the final 6-8 questions as light gray and dark gray, tan, orange, and yellows are difficult to see in the small shapes. Finally, answers don’t match graphically. Shapes I the questions show a white border around a colored box, yet the answers show no white border. (iPhone 6s+) Hopefully the developer will respond.
I know my IQ is around 120, but some of these patterns shown no logical commonalities. When you get about 13 problems in, it’s more difficult to see the relationships between the shapes. I was looking for a number progression at first, but the best way to do it is to choose the answer that seems to make the most sense - but with some of these problems, the progression of shapes don’t appear to have anything in common with the other shapes at all. When I was in middle school or what it was called back then, junior high school, we had a big box of these logic problems, and I got practically a perfect score on those. But it wasn’t just shapes, it was questions and mathematics and some common design problems like these here. I don’t know if I can trust an I Q score that only uses these design problems to make its determination, there should be other types of challenges, because life isn’t just shapes and patterns, there are also words and languages and that should also be part of any IQ test.
I know that the actual is test is designed to center the score around 100, but many people in the reviews are reporting scores over 120. I’m curious if this is just because the people willing to download this app are already kinda smart to begin with. It’s also likely that people only report their score if they consider it to be high anyway. So what’s the actual distribution of this test and how does, say 130 actually rank? I do think it is a precise test though because I got 133 and 127 on the regular and European one respectively.
Try Best Way To Know Your IQ! IQ Test Pro Edition. 2 Different Tests With solutions Reviews "There's always another app claiming to test your brain....