Check the acquisition promise
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Studio 42 · iOS
Explore the ad evidence, study the storefront, and build your next acquisition hypothesis.
01 / Creative research
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Explore apps with direct store-link matches. Compare their hooks and formats without assuming the same approach works here.
Browse observed advertisers ↗Store rankings and revenue estimates describe market context. They do not establish ad spend, conversions or ROAS.
Review the market context ↗02 / Storefront & product
Study the product story and store experience behind the acquisition funnel.
03 / Market context
Keep revenue, downloads and store rankings separate from advertising performance.
There are three main things holding this app back: 1. Hallucinations/Wrong Details: The debate council hallucinates or gets things wrong ALOT. For instance: I recently asked it about a ongoing issue with a friend, and the council repeatedly stated that the friend felt uncomfortable and would have said a certain phrase if they felt that way, despite me a) never stating that the friend felt uncomfortable and b) stating that the friend stated they felt could not say that certain phrase. 2. The Inquisitor is the Worst: Before the debate, a character known as the Inquisitor is supposed to ask for further details for the council, but it just ends up asking questions that have already been clarified in the original text, causing the council to overvalue those pieces of evidence and completely ignore some evidence that’s in the original text. 3. The Price: I would consider paying the subscription price if the above two issues were fixed, but with those issues present currently, it’s not worth the cost.
One there needs to be safe guards The AI’s were asked by people if they should kill themselves or make coffee and they’re voting to ask them to kill themselves Also, they always voted 3 to 2 from what I’ve seen like I can’t get them to vote the same on anything Also there needs to be guard rails to people not to use this as a crutch There’s a very interesting idea but it’s also quite expensive. You should get everything for $40 a year, but asking 30 a month is ridiculous for extra chat bots I like the idea of this, but it needs work. I’m open to feedback from the developers
It’s cute but it’s literally just like talking to Chat GPT. It seems unlikely that any actual programming was done to the different council members beyond just feeding your information to GPT and having it take bite-sized pieces out for the council members’ blurbs. They really all have no personality of their own, they read just like if you were just talking to Chat and told it to respond in a certain way. The council members also regularly vote against the outcome that they were supporting during the debate. Could be cute but needs a lot of work to actually be a fun and useful AI product. Would recommend just continuing to use Chat GPT as your personal diary/digital confidant than to use this right now.
Moot is an AI Decision Maker and AI assistant that helps you make clearer, faster, and more confident decisions. Instead of receiving a single AI answ...
| Name | Price | Type |
|---|---|---|
| The Stoic Advisor | $2.99 | One-time |
| Council Seat Expansion | $4.99 | One-time |
| Moot Pro Monthly | $14.99 | Monthly |
| Moot Max (Monthly) | $24.99 | Monthly |
| Moot Pro (Annual) | $29.99 | Yearly |
| Moot Max (Monthly) | $29.99 | Monthly |
| Moot Pro Yearly | $39.99 | Yearly |
| Moot Pro (Annual) | $49.99 | Yearly |
| Moot Pro (Annual) | $69.99 | Yearly |
| Moot Pro (Annual) | $79.99 | Yearly |