Check the acquisition promise
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Treshna Enterprises · iOS
Explore the ad evidence, study the storefront, and build your next acquisition hypothesis.
01 / Creative research
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Explore apps with direct store-link matches. Compare their hooks and formats without assuming the same approach works here.
Browse observed advertisers ↗Store rankings and revenue estimates describe market context. They do not establish ad spend, conversions or ROAS.
Review the market context ↗02 / Storefront & product
Study the product story and store experience behind the acquisition funnel.
03 / Market context
Keep revenue, downloads and store rankings separate from advertising performance.
My problem started when I deleted and reinstalled the app on the same phone. When I tried to log back in, the app told me I had “reached the maximum number of registered devices”, even though I was still using the exact same device. Apparently the system isn’t smart enough to recognize that it’s the same phone. Because of that, I was completely locked out of the gym. There’s no way to reset the device limit yourself, and since the facility is unstaffed on the weekends (except for a few hours on Saturday), there was no one available to help me reset the limit until Monday. Whoever built this app should understand how device identification works. If someone is using the same exact phone, the system should recognize that it’s the same device. Every phone has a unique device ID, so deleting and reinstalling the app shouldn’t count as a new device. I understand limiting the number of devices to prevent people from sharing accounts and letting others into the gym. That makes sense. But locking someone out when they are clearly using the same phone is just bad design. This feels like a very basic coding oversight. Something this simple shouldn’t prevent paying members from accessing the gym. For a system that controls entry to the building, the app should be much more reliable than this. It’s extremely frustrating to be paying about $40 a month and not even be able to access the building because of a simple app issue. My advice to the owners: stop cutting corners and hire a competent company to build and maintain your app.
It’s a good app and I like the idea so people can just lend their cards to other people to scan in, but it’s extremely slow and could use some format updating, it’s a little basic.
I was tracking outside workouts and weight loss progress in the old IFF app in addition to IFF workouts (which are few because they won't build in Kuna despite many people begging for this). The new app didn't carry over old data pertaining to exercise tracking and weight loss progress. Would be awesome if IFF didn't switch apps. Was using the old data to report to my medical practitioner frequency of exercise. Figured out a way to get the details printed from my Apple Activity App. Why give members a tracking tool then remove access to their history of workouts in the app?
Now it's easier than ever to plan your sessions alongside your schedule. Book classes & sessions on the go, keep your profile up to date and manage yo...