Check the acquisition promise
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Aedit LLC · iOS
Explore the ad evidence, study the storefront, and build your next acquisition hypothesis.
01 / Creative research
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Explore apps with direct store-link matches. Compare their hooks and formats without assuming the same approach works here.
Browse observed advertisers ↗Store rankings and revenue estimates describe market context. They do not establish ad spend, conversions or ROAS.
Review the market context ↗02 / Storefront & product
Study the product story and store experience behind the acquisition funnel.
03 / Market context
Keep revenue, downloads and store rankings separate from advertising performance.
The 3D try-on tool is broken. Procedures either smear the face into a blurry mess, or produce no visible change at all, and work inconsistently between sessions. For an app whose entire pitch is “visualize your results,” this is a fundamental failure. The facial analysis report is a measurement dump with no clinical synthesis. Seventeen separate “above range” / “below range” verdicts with no prioritization, no sequencing, no actual plan. You walk away with a parade of perceived flaws and no idea what to do about them. Several findings read like sales prompts more than honest assessment. Lip volume registers 0.0cc and concludes “your lips appear thin and aged” – functionally an upsell for filler that most men do not want. The “ideal range” framing applies cookie-cutter standards to faces that don’t fit them, then declares everything outside the band a problem. Significant structural omissions. The app does not measure cheekbone width or jaw angle width – two of the most consequential measurements for facial architecture – while obsessing over philtrum length and cupid’s bow angles. This is not what a board-certified facial plastic surgeon would prioritize. The refund policy is predatory. One scan and refunds become ineligible, regardless of whether the analysis or visualizations actually function. Combined with the broken try-on tool, you cannot evaluate the product before committing. $150 for a measurement dump and a broken visualizer. A real consultation with a board-certified surgeon costs the same and gives you actual expertise, accurate visualizations, and the chance to ask questions.
I was hoping to find an app that would help me try on a tear trough or midface filler. This app was recommended by several different sources. Even after I paid for the pro version, I still can’t figure out how to try on just this procedure. The app advertises that they offer hundreds of procedures to try on but from what I can see, the pro version just offers 12 minor procedure try ons. They do have hundreds of descriptions of procedures. I don’t need a description, I wanted a semi accurate rendering of my face altered by a specific procedure. Unless I’m missing something, in which case they should provide a better user name interface, they are misleading potential users with the app’s capabilities. Would not recommend!
Face cant analysis well no use even trying to use the app until you have the right analysis I bought it so you don’t have to and your welcome. I have been shanked again. I will not buy until I try ever again if you can’t see it first then it’s not good enough to buy simple and emotional purchases don’t make the app any better dev are taking advantage of everyone because you let them no I’m no bitter not at all
Over 159,000 downloads and counting! Come join AEDIT’s AI Plastic Surgeon™ community; the leading app for cosmetic facial analysis and procedure “try...
| Name | Price | Type |
|---|---|---|
| All Access Pro Monthly | $59.99 | Monthly |
| All Access Pro Semiannual | $159.99 | Semi-Annual |
| All Access Pro Annual | $299.00 | Yearly |