Check the acquisition promise
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Jeremy Junod · iOS
Explore the ad evidence, study the storefront, and build your next acquisition hypothesis.
01 / Creative research
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Explore apps with direct store-link matches. Compare their hooks and formats without assuming the same approach works here.
Browse observed advertisers ↗Store rankings and revenue estimates describe market context. They do not establish ad spend, conversions or ROAS.
Review the market context ↗02 / Storefront & product
Study the product story and store experience behind the acquisition funnel.
03 / Market context
Keep revenue, downloads and store rankings separate from advertising performance.
I tested this app out with the same card used the ai grader multiple times on the same card and got the same results and I love that it lets you know what it’s selling for now very cool app I highly recommend it if you have cards that you are thinking about spending the money to have them graded!
I evaluated a well worn 1957 topps card that clearly has surface issues (cracking in the gloss that look like scratches). I checked it twice with the 3 credits you get for free. One deep scan and one quick scan. Both times the surface came back as 10s. At best the surface is a 4 or 5. The other subgrades were pretty accurate. The pricing model is confusing. On one hand it seems like you pay for credits that you spend on scans, which is a great model, but then when you go to sign up, it’s a monthly charge four a certain number of credits. So do unused credits expire at the end of each month? If so, it’s a pretty expensive grader. Regardless, the surface grading is a deal killer for now.
Fine for centering and market price estimates, but an absolute failure for grading. I graded 3 Pokemon cards to evaluate the app. One of the cards I literally removed from 27 year old original plastic and immediately sleeved 3 days prior. I bought the starter set the card came from in 1999, so I knew its history. The card was pristine, but the app graded it a 7/10, due to excessive corner nicks and frayed edges it claimed were likely caused by poor handling or excessive playing. When I told the AI agent “Carl” the card was literally out of the package, it suggested I had the wrong card, that I was confused. The second card was misidentified. It recognized Pikachu as a different character, Charmander, and graded the card a 7, again for damaged edges and corners not matching reality. The third card was graded 3.5, for a card I seriously considered a potential 10, again citing visible damage not matching reality. I cancelled my subscription immediately and deleted the app.
Know if your card is worth grading Card Grader uses AI to analyze your trading cards and predict grades. Just snap a photo. • Analyze centering, cor...
| Name | Price | Type |
|---|---|---|
| CardGrader 10 (Monthly) | $5.99 | Monthly |
| Collector (Monthly) | $7.99 | Monthly |
| Collector (Monthly) | $9.99 | Monthly |
| CardGrader 100 (Monthly) | $17.99 | Monthly |
| Pro (Monthly) | $17.99 | Monthly |
| Pro (Monthly) | $19.99 | Monthly |
| Dealer (Monthly) | $29.99 | Monthly |
| CardGrader 500 (Monthly) | $29.99 | Monthly |
| Collector (Annual) | $49.99 | Yearly |
| Collector (Annual) | $59.99 | Yearly |