Check the acquisition promise
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗High Court of Kerala · iOS
Explore the ad evidence, study the storefront, and build your next acquisition hypothesis.
01 / Creative research
Read the store headline, screenshots and description. What problem is the app promising to solve?
Study the storefront ↗Explore apps with direct store-link matches. Compare their hooks and formats without assuming the same approach works here.
Browse observed advertisers ↗Store rankings and revenue estimates describe market context. They do not establish ad spend, conversions or ROAS.
Review the market context ↗02 / Storefront & product
Study the product story and store experience behind the acquisition funnel.
03 / Market context
Keep revenue, downloads and store rankings separate from advertising performance.
This is not a lawyer friendly app … there are several defects…one such defect is that once you mark a case as favourite… you expect that case to show up on the posting date … that is not happening here … once you search the case through party name .. you are not able to open the case … Just naming a few …
my experience has been highly unsatisfactory. The biggest issue is that I cannot add cases to my mobile application unless I have vakalath in those cases. This makes it almost unusable for those who want to follow cases as a litigant, researcher, or general public observer. Because I cannot save or add cases, I am forced to manually search for them every single time by entering all the case details repeatedly. This is tedious, time-consuming, and completely opposite to the convenience that a mobile app should provide. In contrast, the previous eCourts application was far more user-friendly and accessible. It allowed adding any case to my watchlist without restrictions, enabling quick and efficient tracking. The DCMS app’s current design feels like a step backward. It restricts access to information instead of facilitating it. Suggestion: •The authorities should consider running the previous eCourts application in parallel with DCMS until all features — especially the ability to add and track any case — are restored. •Alternatively, DCMS should be updated to allow case tracking without the vakalath restriction, at least for public court records. Until such changes are made, I find the DCMS app inconvenient and inefficient compared to its predecessor.
There is a bug where some times the daily cases is shown nil and some times it shows correct.
Developed by the High Court of Kerala, this official app provides advocates and the public with seamless access to Trial Court case details across Ker...